Comments
The same functionality is not working with multiple counter lines. The example above shows a counter line being used with a time line. If you are using multiple lines that are all counter lines, you get the same result described above. It will not suppress work order generation like it is supposed to do.
Use case: We have multiple users attending many different training or conference events. We like to see what the "actual spend" was for the various transactions that may have been posted through the GL, AP and EXPENSE REPORTS. We would like to create a Financial Tag called "Event" as a custom list. We would maintain that custom list. Users could then select that Event as a Financial Tag on the Expense Report, AP or GL - and we would have a "full accounting" of charges to that event. Project, and activities are an alternative in this use case, but we think the Financial Tag experience would provide additional benefits.
Hi
Definitely a yes from here.
It is in our currently solution to book eliminations within the consolidation system.
It will be much more efficient to consolidate if the elimination ledgers are to be booked within the consolidation system. Hence the ledgers are created here and it it possible to see the effect directly and if everything ads up.
Moving the currency difference out of the consolidation entity to a separate entity - gives possibilities for providing mistakes and the need to run unnecessary pre consolidations
Thank you
While I think I understand why this was done, it isn't inline with Microsoft's current recommendations to utilize Service Principals for deployment. You are basically left to also have a Service Account to make changes that would require the Service Principal to be configured in this way. Which simply doesn't make sense. That should only be required if the action you are performing requires Tenant Level permissions.
In our particular case we want to assign users roles. The S2S user has System Administrator permissions which should be more than enough for this to work. But it is not. It requires you to configure the Service Principal as a Tenant Administrator :(
Hi Philipp,
customizing the theme for an environment is possible, see documentation: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/power-apps/maker/model-driven-apps/modern-theme-overrides
But it's not possible, to transport these customization with different colors for different environments from dev to test to prod.
Actually you need to do this on each environment again.
Therefore I would like to enrich your idea by providing a feature to transport different customizations with different colors to the target environments.